From b114e958142f2a4dcbed3e5b098c51d326f5aac2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: git-bruh Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 16:37:59 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] rust: 1.83.0 --- extra/rust/build | 3 +- extra/rust/checksums | 11 +- extra/rust/patches/fix-linux_musl_base.patch | 4 +- extra/rust/patches/fix-llvm19.patch | 242 ------------------- extra/rust/sources | 9 +- extra/rust/version | 2 +- 6 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 257 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 extra/rust/patches/fix-llvm19.patch diff --git a/extra/rust/build b/extra/rust/build index 24fbb470..9fa84824 100755 --- a/extra/rust/build +++ b/extra/rust/build @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ mv -f _ vendor/curl-sys-0.4.74+curl-8.9.0/.cargo-checksum.json cat > config.toml < TargetOptions { + pub(crate) fn opts() -> TargetOptions { let mut base = base::linux::opts(); base.env = "musl".into(); diff --git a/extra/rust/patches/fix-llvm19.patch b/extra/rust/patches/fix-llvm19.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 8a6ca358..00000000 --- a/extra/rust/patches/fix-llvm19.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,242 +0,0 @@ -From 1dc106121b62562ead6e7d612fa136dc4b35cd5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Kyle Huey -Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 11:38:14 -0800 -Subject: [PATCH] Add discriminators to DILocations when multiple functions are - inlined into a single point. - -LLVM does not expect to ever see multiple dbg_declares for the same variable at the same -location with different values. proc-macros make it possible for arbitrary code, -including multiple calls that get inlined, to happen at any given location in the source -code. Add discriminators when that happens so these locations are different to LLVM. - -This may interfere with the AddDiscriminators pass in LLVM, which is added by the -unstable flag -Zdebug-info-for-profiling. - -Fixes #131944 ---- - .../src/debuginfo/create_scope_map.rs | 60 ++++++++++++++++++- - compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/ffi.rs | 4 ++ - .../rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp | 8 +++ - .../auxiliary/macro_def.rs | 11 ++++ - .../mir_inlined_twice_var_locs.rs | 53 ++++++++++++++++ - 5 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) - create mode 100644 tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/auxiliary/macro_def.rs - create mode 100644 tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/mir_inlined_twice_var_locs.rs - -diff --git a/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/debuginfo/create_scope_map.rs b/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/debuginfo/create_scope_map.rs -index ac6c2fb1b83a6..0f1909486ec7e 100644 ---- a/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/debuginfo/create_scope_map.rs -+++ b/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/debuginfo/create_scope_map.rs -@@ -1,11 +1,15 @@ -+use std::collections::hash_map::Entry; -+ - use rustc_codegen_ssa::mir::debuginfo::{DebugScope, FunctionDebugContext}; - use rustc_codegen_ssa::traits::*; -+use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap; - use rustc_index::bit_set::BitSet; - use rustc_index::Idx; - use rustc_middle::mir::{Body, SourceScope}; - use rustc_middle::ty::layout::FnAbiOf; - use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Instance}; - use rustc_session::config::DebugInfo; -+use rustc_span::BytePos; - - use super::metadata::file_metadata; - use super::utils::DIB; -@@ -37,10 +41,20 @@ pub(crate) fn compute_mir_scopes<'ll, 'tcx>( - None - }; - let mut instantiated = BitSet::new_empty(mir.source_scopes.len()); -+ let mut discriminators = FxHashMap::default(); - // Instantiate all scopes. - for idx in 0..mir.source_scopes.len() { - let scope = SourceScope::new(idx); -- make_mir_scope(cx, instance, mir, &variables, debug_context, &mut instantiated, scope); -+ make_mir_scope( -+ cx, -+ instance, -+ mir, -+ &variables, -+ debug_context, -+ &mut instantiated, -+ &mut discriminators, -+ scope, -+ ); - } - assert!(instantiated.count() == mir.source_scopes.len()); - } -@@ -52,6 +66,7 @@ fn make_mir_scope<'ll, 'tcx>( - variables: &Option>, - debug_context: &mut FunctionDebugContext<'tcx, &'ll DIScope, &'ll DILocation>, - instantiated: &mut BitSet, -+ discriminators: &mut FxHashMap, - scope: SourceScope, - ) { - if instantiated.contains(scope) { -@@ -60,7 +75,16 @@ fn make_mir_scope<'ll, 'tcx>( - - let scope_data = &mir.source_scopes[scope]; - let parent_scope = if let Some(parent) = scope_data.parent_scope { -- make_mir_scope(cx, instance, mir, variables, debug_context, instantiated, parent); -+ make_mir_scope( -+ cx, -+ instance, -+ mir, -+ variables, -+ debug_context, -+ instantiated, -+ discriminators, -+ parent, -+ ); - debug_context.scopes[parent] - } else { - // The root is the function itself. -@@ -117,7 +141,37 @@ fn make_mir_scope<'ll, 'tcx>( - // FIXME(eddyb) this doesn't account for the macro-related - // `Span` fixups that `rustc_codegen_ssa::mir::debuginfo` does. - let callsite_scope = parent_scope.adjust_dbg_scope_for_span(cx, callsite_span); -- cx.dbg_loc(callsite_scope, parent_scope.inlined_at, callsite_span) -+ let loc = cx.dbg_loc(callsite_scope, parent_scope.inlined_at, callsite_span); -+ -+ // NB: In order to produce proper debug info for variables (particularly -+ // arguments) in multiply-inline functions, LLVM expects to see a single -+ // DILocalVariable with multiple different DILocations in the IR. While -+ // the source information for each DILocation would be identical, their -+ // inlinedAt attributes will be unique to the particular callsite. -+ // -+ // We generate DILocations here based on the callsite's location in the -+ // source code. A single location in the source code usually can't -+ // produce multiple distinct calls so this mostly works, until -+ // proc-macros get involved. A proc-macro can generate multiple calls -+ // at the same span, which breaks the assumption that we're going to -+ // produce a unique DILocation for every scope we process here. We -+ // have to explicitly add discriminators if we see inlines into the -+ // same source code location. -+ // -+ // Note further that we can't key this hashtable on the span itself, -+ // because these spans could have distinct SyntaxContexts. We have -+ // to key on exactly what we're giving to LLVM. -+ match discriminators.entry(callsite_span.lo()) { -+ Entry::Occupied(mut o) => { -+ *o.get_mut() += 1; -+ unsafe { llvm::LLVMRustDILocationCloneWithBaseDiscriminator(loc, *o.get()) } -+ .expect("Failed to encode discriminator in DILocation") -+ } -+ Entry::Vacant(v) => { -+ v.insert(0); -+ loc -+ } -+ } - }); - - debug_context.scopes[scope] = DebugScope { -diff --git a/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/ffi.rs b/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/ffi.rs -index 3d2e270a3868e..75a5ec44c2285 100644 ---- a/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/ffi.rs -+++ b/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/ffi.rs -@@ -2174,6 +2174,10 @@ unsafe extern "C" { - Scope: &'a DIScope, - InlinedAt: Option<&'a DILocation>, - ) -> &'a DILocation; -+ pub fn LLVMRustDILocationCloneWithBaseDiscriminator<'a>( -+ Location: &'a DILocation, -+ BD: c_uint, -+ ) -> Option<&'a DILocation>; - pub fn LLVMRustDIBuilderCreateOpDeref() -> u64; - pub fn LLVMRustDIBuilderCreateOpPlusUconst() -> u64; - pub fn LLVMRustDIBuilderCreateOpLLVMFragment() -> u64; -diff --git a/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp b/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp -index 9330c83b7f230..cd70c3f266920 100644 ---- a/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp -+++ b/compiler/rustc_llvm/llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp -@@ -1305,6 +1305,14 @@ LLVMRustDIBuilderCreateDebugLocation(unsigned Line, unsigned Column, - return wrap(Loc); - } - -+extern "C" LLVMMetadataRef -+LLVMRustDILocationCloneWithBaseDiscriminator(LLVMMetadataRef Location, -+ unsigned BD) { -+ DILocation *Loc = unwrapDIPtr(Location); -+ auto NewLoc = Loc->cloneWithBaseDiscriminator(BD); -+ return wrap(NewLoc.has_value() ? NewLoc.value() : nullptr); -+} -+ - extern "C" uint64_t LLVMRustDIBuilderCreateOpDeref() { - return dwarf::DW_OP_deref; - } -diff --git a/tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/auxiliary/macro_def.rs b/tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/auxiliary/macro_def.rs -new file mode 100644 -index 0000000000000..159ecfd09743d ---- /dev/null -+++ b/tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/auxiliary/macro_def.rs -@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ -+//@ force-host -+//@ no-prefer-dynamic -+#![crate_type = "proc-macro"] -+ -+extern crate proc_macro; -+use proc_macro::*; -+ -+#[proc_macro] -+pub fn square_twice(_item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream { -+ "(square(env::vars().count() as i32), square(env::vars().count() as i32))".parse().unwrap() -+} -diff --git a/tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/mir_inlined_twice_var_locs.rs b/tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/mir_inlined_twice_var_locs.rs -new file mode 100644 -index 0000000000000..c3858044c0c9f ---- /dev/null -+++ b/tests/codegen/debuginfo-proc-macro/mir_inlined_twice_var_locs.rs -@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ -+//@ min-llvm-version: 19 -+//@ compile-flags: -Cdebuginfo=2 -Copt-level=0 -Zmir-enable-passes=+Inline -+// MSVC is different because of the individual allocas. -+//@ ignore-msvc -+ -+//@ aux-build:macro_def.rs -+ -+// Find the variable. -+// CHECK-DAG: ![[#var_dbg:]] = !DILocalVariable(name: "n",{{( arg: 1,)?}} scope: ![[#var_scope:]] -+ -+// Find both dbg_declares. These will proceed the variable metadata, of course, so we're looking -+// backwards. -+// CHECK-DAG: dbg_declare(ptr %n.dbg.spill{{[0-9]}}, ![[#var_dbg]], !DIExpression(), ![[#var_loc2:]]) -+// CHECK-DAG: dbg_declare(ptr %n.dbg.spill, ![[#var_dbg]], !DIExpression(), ![[#var_loc1:]]) -+ -+// Find the first location definition, looking forwards again. -+// CHECK: ![[#var_loc1]] = !DILocation -+// CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[#var_scope:]], inlinedAt: ![[#var_inlinedAt1:]] -+ -+// Find the first location's inlinedAt -+// NB: If we fail here it's *probably* because we failed to produce two -+// different locations and ended up reusing an earlier one. -+// CHECK: ![[#var_inlinedAt1]] = !DILocation -+// CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[var_inlinedAt1_scope:]] -+ -+// Find the second location definition, still looking forwards. -+// NB: If we failed to produce two different locations, the test will -+// definitely fail by this point (if it hasn't already) because we won't -+// be able to find the same line again. -+// CHECK: ![[#var_loc2]] = !DILocation -+// CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[#var_scope]], inlinedAt: ![[#var_inlinedAt2:]] -+ -+// Find the second location's inlinedAt. -+// CHECK: ![[#var_inlinedAt2]] = !DILocation -+// CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[#var_inlinedAt2_scope:]] -+ -+// Finally, check that a discriminator was emitted for the second scope. -+// FIXMEkhuey ideally we would check that *either* scope has a discriminator -+// but I don't know that it's possible to check that with FileCheck. -+// CHECK: ![[#var_inlinedAt2_scope]] = !DILexicalBlockFile -+// CHECK-SAME: discriminator: [[#]] -+extern crate macro_def; -+ -+use std::env; -+ -+fn square(n: i32) -> i32 { -+ n * n -+} -+ -+fn main() { -+ let (z1, z2) = macro_def::square_twice!(); -+ println!("{z1} == {z2}"); -+} diff --git a/extra/rust/sources b/extra/rust/sources index 05edb85b..5fe11637 100644 --- a/extra/rust/sources +++ b/extra/rust/sources @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ -https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-1.82.0-src.tar.xz -https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/2024-09-05/rust-std-1.81.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl.tar.xz?no-extract -https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/2024-09-05/rustc-1.81.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl.tar.xz?no-extract -https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/2024-09-05/cargo-1.81.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl.tar.xz?no-extract +https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-1.83.0-src.tar.xz +https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/2024-10-17/rust-std-1.82.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl.tar.xz?no-extract +https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/2024-10-17/rustc-1.82.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl.tar.xz?no-extract +https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/2024-10-17/cargo-1.82.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl.tar.xz?no-extract patches/fix-curl.patch patches/fix-linux_musl_base.patch -patches/fix-llvm19.patch diff --git a/extra/rust/version b/extra/rust/version index 4dd8a779..0cf1c7a3 100644 --- a/extra/rust/version +++ b/extra/rust/version @@ -1 +1 @@ -1.82.0 1 +1.83.0 1