Redirects and pipes should be atomic—one should wait for another to conclude before beginning—as it would allow an interesting flow of data (including the ability to pipe a stream and redirect a file into a utility).
Redirects and pipes should be atomic—one should wait for another to conclude before beginning—as it would allow an interesting flow of data (including the ability to pipe a stream *and* redirect a file into a utility).
one should wait for another to conclude before beginning
What do you mean by this? Because I take it to mean that if you have:
ar | bar | car
Then ar runs, its output is buffered and then sent to bar, which then does the same thing to car, which then outputs to stdout or what have you. The problem with this is if ar outputs 2 gigabytes of data, now you have 2 gigabytes of data sitting in memory, and ar must generate all of it before bar or car can run at all. Only one factory worker on the assembly line can move their arms at a time and you produce only one car per day.
> one should wait for another to conclude before beginning
What do you mean by this? Because I take it to mean that if you have:
```sh
ar | bar | car
```
Then `ar` runs, its output is buffered and then sent to `bar`, which then does the same thing to `car`, which then outputs to stdout or what have you. The problem with this is if `ar` outputs 2 gigabytes of data, now you have 2 gigabytes of data sitting in memory, and `ar` must generate all of it before `bar` or `car` can run at all. Only one factory worker on the assembly line can move their arms at a time and you produce only one `car` per day.
In this example: ar | bar | car <file
data flows through the pipes to carfirst, before attempting to read in file using a redirect to car. This assumes car attempts two reads in the course of its execution.
In this example:
`ar | bar | car <file`
data flows through the pipes to `car` *first*, before attempting to read in `file` using a redirect to `car`. This assumes `car` attempts two reads in the course of its execution.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Redirects and pipes should be atomic—one should wait for another to conclude before beginning—as it would allow an interesting flow of data (including the ability to pipe a stream and redirect a file into a utility).
What do you mean by this? Because I take it to mean that if you have:
Then
arruns, its output is buffered and then sent tobar, which then does the same thing tocar, which then outputs to stdout or what have you. The problem with this is ifaroutputs 2 gigabytes of data, now you have 2 gigabytes of data sitting in memory, andarmust generate all of it beforebarorcarcan run at all. Only one factory worker on the assembly line can move their arms at a time and you produce only onecarper day.In this example:
ar | bar | car <filedata flows through the pipes to
carfirst, before attempting to read infileusing a redirect tocar. This assumescarattempts two reads in the course of its execution.