5.8 KiB
5.8 KiB
Cooperatives
Co-ops are more productive, robust, resistant to price shocks, and increase worker pay and engagement (as opposed to a firm organized by a traditional employer-employee framework). Increased employee engagement in decision-making at all levels is consistently associated with better performance.
- Doucouliagos 95
- Meta-analysis of 43 studies comparing various forms of worker participation in business
- Found that “profit sharing, worker ownership, and worker participation in decision making are all positively associated with productivity”
- These observed correlations are stronger in worker-managed firms than in traditional capitalist firms
- Bit outdated as it’s from 1995 and only shows correlation, but still useful
- Pérotin 15: UK Coop Report
- HUGE analysis of a large quantity of data on worker cooperatives
- Worker cooperatives are found to:
- be larger than conventional businesses
- survive as well or better than ther businesses
- have more stable employment
- Be more productive than conventional businesses, with staff working “better and smarter” and production organized more efficiently
- have workers retain a larger share of their profits than other business models
- Pérotin 12
- The study found increased productivity in the case of:
- Increased profit sharing (note: this may also involve reverse causality, although data on ESOPs seems to thoroughly verify this anyway)
- A higher proportion of employees becoming cooperative member, thus increasing participation in decision-making (in France and Italy)
- A greater proportion of workers on the board (in the UK)
- The study found increased productivity in the case of:
- Williams 07
- After 1 year, 50-60% of corporations fail while only 10% of cooperatives do
- After 5 years, 90% of Co-Ops remain open while only 3-5% of standard corporations do
- Co-op Law
- Co-ops have been shown multilaterally to be more resilient and less likely to fail than traditionally-operated businesses
- Coops also face unique barriers to entry which might be mitigated through the transformation of existing enterprises into worker’s coops.
- Burdín & Dean 09
- Economic analysis of capitalist firms vs worker cooperatives in Uruguay from 1996-2005
- Coops have a greater correspondence between profit increase and wage increase
- Employment in coops is more resistant to price shocks
- Employment has a negative correlation with wages for capitalist firms and a positive correlation with wages in worker coops
- Conte, M. A., & Svejnar, J. 88
- Worker participation in management seems to increase technical efficiency.
- Abell 14
- Coops make $652 billion in revenue, hold around $3 trillion in assets, and employ nearly one million people in the U.S., showing that coops are already successfully contributing to the U.S. economy
- Data shows that worker coops:
- can increase worker incomes by 70-80%
- have 9-19% greater levels of productivity
- have 45% lower turnover rates
- are 30% less likely to fail in the first few years of operation
- Craig & Pencavel 95
- Study of worker coops in the timber industry of Washington state
- “What differences we have found imply that coops are more efficient than the principal conventional firms by between 6 and 14 percent”
- Sabatini et al. 12
- Study based on a 2011 questionnaire in Trento, Italy
- Found that employment in cooperative enterprises increases trust between workers relative to public and private enterprises
- 47.5% increase relative to public enterprises
- 36.9% increase relative to private enterprises
- Park 18
- In conventional firms, there is a negative relationship between job demands and worker commitment
- This negative relationship was not found in worker co-ops
- Erdal 12
- Study of three Italian towns of similar demographics, income, and geography
- The town with the most worker cooperatives experienced the following:
- Better mental and physical health, as well as longer lives
- Children were less likely to skip school and skipped school less
- Less crime, including less domestic violence and greater feelings of safety.
- Higher rates of ‘social participation’ (joining clubs and charities, giving blood, voting)
- Perception of a more positive society, more supportive personal networks, and more trust in the government
- Note: this study fails to prove causation, and only establishes a correlation between coop prevalence and community wellbeing