19 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
19 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
## Bathroom Bills
|
||
|
||
#### Evidence for the public safety argument in regards to bathroom bills is unsubstantiated in data.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
* [Hasenbush et al. 19](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13178-018-0335-z)
|
||
* **Analysis of crime & privacy violations** as they relate to concerns raised by those who advocate for ‘**trans bathroom bills**’
|
||
* Analysis indicates there is **no empirical evidence to support these concerns**; such crimes & privacy violations are **exceedingly rare**. Calls for trans bathroom bills are **fear mongering**, plain and simple.
|
||
* [NatCen: Curtice et al 19](https://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/media/39363/bsa_36.pdf)
|
||
* A vast majority of cis women are not, in fact, concerned about which facilities transgender people use.
|
||
* "**72% of women** said that they were “**very**” or “**quite comfortable**” with a transgender woman using a "female toilet"
|
||
* This one excludes the "neither comfortable nor uncomfortable" answer which was **another 14%** from the 2017 survey
|
||
* [Media Matters: Percelay 15](https://www.mediamatters.org/sexual-harassment-sexual-assault/17-school-districts-debunk-right-wing-lies-about-protections)
|
||
* Non-academic source with liberal leanings; nonetheless legitimate findings
|
||
* Organization contacted officials at the largest school districts in **12 states** with gender identity protections on the books
|
||
* School districts were asked if there were “any incidences of harassment or inappropriate behavior” as a result of “allowing transgender students to access facilities they're comfortable with.”
|
||
* **0 school districts** (which represent over **600,000 students**) have had any increase incidents of harassment or inappropriate behavior after the law passed
|