1
0
Fork 0

2023-10-21

This commit is contained in:
dtb 2023-10-21 15:56:12 -05:00
parent edfd476447
commit 1606eecc90
1 changed files with 223 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -1929,6 +1929,229 @@ If I don't, escalate the issue to the host of this site (this can also be found
</HTML>
/blah/2023-10-21.html
: fuck unrar
I run Chimera Linux, an Alpine-based operating system still in its very early
stages but stable enough that I trust it for my meager, mostly console and X11
based workflow. It can run a C compiler, so good enough for me. The only issue
is, despite being based on Alpine, a popular operating system not for desktop
but for embedded environments like containers, for which a lot of software is
packaged and available in system repositories, Chimera does not have a lot of
packages. I'm going to package UNRAR, a non-free ("freeware") tool that has no
dependencies aside from the C++ standard library, to get a feel for Alpine
packaging.
UNRAR is an almost delightful little tool with the unfortunate, heinous problem
of being non-free, and its license forbidding the use of the provided source
code for reimplementation - otherwise I would just rewrite it in sane C89
without encumbrence. But we don't need to read the source code in order to
compile the C++.
The Alpine Wiki section on Creating an Alpine package says to apk add
alpine-sdk but Chimera has no such thing so hopefully that's fine. It says to
check out the aports tree but I don't want to put my packages upstream (dealing
with large software projects is tiresome and I know Chimera is in a constant
state of flux).
I did this:
# mkdir -p /var/cache/distfiles
# chmod a+w /var/cache/distfiles
I now need abuild-keygen according to the wiki but it isn't installed.
$ apk search abuild-keygen
pulled up nothing. Nor did a package contents search. Maybe it's fine? On a
whim I searched cbuild* in the contents search and found apk:base-cbuild-progs.
# apk add base-cbuild-progs
(1/1) Installing base-cbuild-progs (0.1-r2)
OK: 2083 MiB in 896 packages
On the Chimera Linux website I found the Chimera-specific packaging stuff.
There is a cports repository with Packaging.md but it's kind of long so I'll
use it as a reference while following the less complete Alpine guide. This is
the rat bastard approach to software but I am doing this for my own uses and
for pleasure and I don't wanna spend five hours contributing to this project
right now because I am tired.
I need newapkbuild but don't have it so I'll try to find the default template
on-line or go off an existing thingy.
I found contrib/jq/template.py so I'll copy that.
pkgname = "unrar"
What's the pkgver?
$ cd /usr/local/src/unrar
-sh: 5: cd: can't cd to /usr/local/src/unrar
$ cd /usr/local/src
$ ls
$
Connection to tebibyte.media closed.
; # oops
; cd /usr/local/src/unrar
; cat version.hpp
#define RARVER_MAJOR 6
#define RARVER_MINOR 24
#define RARVER_BETA 1
#define RARVER_DAY 17
#define RARVER_MONTH 9
#define RARVER_YEAR 2023
I guess it doesn't matter because the download link says 6.12.2, so I'll just
put that. Maybe I have a different version. I don't care.
pkgver = "6.12.2" #
pkgrel = 0 # default
build_style = "makefile"
make_cmd = "gmake" # this probably doesn't matter, it worked with bmake too
make_dir = "."
hostmakedepends = [ "gmake" ]
pkgdesc = "Extracts from RAR archives"
maintainer = "trinity <trinity@trinity.moe>"
# license is tricky. how does alpine do it?
# checked. alpine does not do it, because unrar is non-free
What is this license, anyway?
; cat license.txt
****** ***** ****** UnRAR - free utility for RAR archives
** ** ** ** ** ** ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
****** ******* ****** License for use and distribution of
** ** ** ** ** ** ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
** ** ** ** ** ** FREE portable version
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The source code of UnRAR utility is freeware. This means:
1. All copyrights to RAR and the utility UnRAR are exclusively
owned by the author - Alexander Roshal.
2. UnRAR source code may be used in any software to handle
RAR archives without limitations free of charge, but cannot be
used to develop RAR (WinRAR) compatible archiver and to
re-create RAR compression algorithm, which is proprietary.
Distribution of modified UnRAR source code in separate form
or as a part of other software is permitted, provided that
full text of this paragraph, starting from "UnRAR source code"
words, is included in license, or in documentation if license
is not available, and in source code comments of resulting package.
3. The UnRAR utility may be freely distributed. It is allowed
to distribute UnRAR inside of other software packages.
4. THE RAR ARCHIVER AND THE UnRAR UTILITY ARE DISTRIBUTED "AS IS".
NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. YOU USE AT
YOUR OWN RISK. THE AUTHOR WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR DATA LOSS,
DAMAGES, LOSS OF PROFITS OR ANY OTHER KIND OF LOSS WHILE USING
OR MISUSING THIS SOFTWARE.
5. Installing and using the UnRAR utility signifies acceptance of
these terms and conditions of the license.
6. If you don't agree with terms of the license you must remove
UnRAR files from your storage devices and cease to use the
utility.
Thank you for your interest in RAR and UnRAR.
Alexander L. Roshal
Line omitted before signature because of how this blah is formatted.
This is fucking bullshit. I'm already in violation of clause 6 because I wish
Alexandar L. Roshal to eat flaming death and be obliterated from this mortal
plane but I won't be fucking anyone over legally by copying the code.
2021-10-20
[ 9:52 PM] trinity: bsdtar WORKS ON FUCKING RAR FILES?????
[ 9:52 PM] trinity: 7z DID NOT DO THE JOB BUT bsdtar DID?
[ 9:58 PM] [...]: that's shocking actually wtf
[10:03 PM] trinity: bsdtar errors out too :(
[10:03 PM] trinity: no unrar package for chimera
[10:04 PM] trinity: not pkgsrcing it because 500 deps compiling on a raspberry
pi
[10:18 PM] trinity: figured out how to build unrar from source. NO DEPS!
[10:18 PM] trinity: for nonfree software it sure is easy build
[10:21 PM] [...]: why somebody would ever use a nonfree compressed archive
format is beyond me
[10:21 PM] [...]: .tar.gz is standard. .arc and .zpaq are fucking insane with
compression ratios.
2021-10-21
[12:12 AM] trinity: i really dont understand use of rar
[12:12 AM] trinity: as mainstream archives go 7z is a lot better
[12:13 AM] [...]: yeah
[12:13 AM] [...]: I see rar used a lot in piracy stuff and I'm not rlly sure
what that's about
[12:19 AM] [...]: wait i can use bsdtar for unrar
[12:19 AM] [...]: pog
[12:20 AM] trinity: unrar works better
[12:20 AM] [...]: i dont have any way to unrar things atm because i
uninstalled unrar for being nonfree
[12:20 AM] trinity: unrar for nonfree software is not very bad. i oughtta just
rewrite it in C
[12:20 AM] [...]: someone has done that
[12:21 AM] [...]: you could build on their work
[12:21 AM] trinity: wouldnt that be free software
[12:21 AM] trinity: fuck actually i dont like unrar's everything i should just
make my own unrar based on the nonfree code
[12:22 AM] trinity: license forbids this :(
[12:22 AM] [...]: violating proprietary licenses is based
[12:23 AM] [...]: unrar (super illegal edition!!)
[12:23 AM] [...]: it doesnt currently work afaik. it works for older rar files
[12:24 AM] trinity: is there much difference
[12:26 AM] trinity: REing rar seems to not be that useful because soon everyone
that uses it will be dead and everyone will be using
something open
[12:27 AM] [...]: idk
[12:27 AM] [...]: rarverse engineering
[12:28 AM] [...]: ill probably just write a wrapper for bsdtar that can be
called on rar files
[12:28 AM] [...]: rawrverse engineewing~ >.<
[12:29 AM] trinity: because unrar, while proprietary, can be compiled with any
C++ compiler and make tool and works with standard POSIX
APIs, i don't think the ability to decompress will be
threatened any time soon. best rebellion is just to decomp
and recomp rar files into better formats
[12:30 AM] trinity: did you know that rawr means i love you in dinosaur
AAAA I give up.
Chimera docs say very little about -doc packages, which should have the license
file for the current software if the license is custom, which UnRAR's is. So
license.txt should go in "$pkgdir"/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/COPYING
Wait I get it. The cbuild will automagically add that license to the -doc
package for me. Nevermind. So I just have to
license = "custom"
def post_install(self):
self.install_license("license.txt")
url = "https://www.rarlab.com/rar_add.htm"
source = f"https://www.rarlab.com/rar/unrarsrc-{pkgver}.tar.gz"
Okay, this would probably work, but I don't care to actually button this up and
PR it so that's all it will be. Here's how it looks in my src/Makefile which
works better for my uses:
# depends on
# apk:g++
$(PREFIX)/bin/unrar:
git clone https://github.com/pmachapman/unrar.git "$(PREFIX)"/src/unrar
$(MAKE) -C "$(PREFIX)"/src/unrar
$(INSTALL) -Dm0755 "$(PREFIX)"/src/unrar/unrar "$(PREFIX)"/bin/unrar
To be honest, I copied the install(1) permission from somewhere else. Not sure
if 0755 is the best config. But I don't care because FUCK UNRAR!!!!
/blah/2023-10-14.html
: no filter