1
0

more stuff

This commit is contained in:
devenblake 2020-12-30 16:17:19 -05:00
parent 9df232dbf4
commit 6180f76503
3 changed files with 46 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ Oh well.
<LI><A HREF="http://paper-io.com/">Paper.io</A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="https://software-lab.de/penti.html">Penti Chorded Keyboard</A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="https://www.pokemon.com/us/">Pokémon</A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="https://psxparty.kosmi.io/">PSX Party</A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="http://slither.io/">Slither.io</A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="https://en.shindanmaker.com/878761">stupid horny feral clown cursed baby</A></LI>
</UL>

View File

@ -64,7 +64,9 @@ window.initializequotes = function() {
[ "Your enemy is where you are not.",
"Sun Tzu (paraphrased)" ],
[ "Be everywhere.",
"social media influencing 101" ]
"social media influencing 101" ],
[ "I wish everyone was bald.",
"Anonymous" ]
];
window.quote = 0;
}

View File

@ -24,7 +24,22 @@ This is my "shitlist", or list of things you shouldn't like (- I like some of th
This is a list of <B>public figures and brands</B>, nothing personal.
If you're on this list you're probably famous enough to not have to care.
</P>
<H2>Disclaimers</H2><UL>
<H2>(Partial) Table of Contents</H2><UL>
<H3><A HREF="#disclaimers">Disclaimers</A></H3>
<H3><A HREF="#brands">Brands</A></H3><UL>
<P><A HREF="#alphabet">Alphabet, Inc.</A></P>
<P><A HREF="#amazon">Amazon</A></P>
<P><A HREF="#apple">Apple Computer</A></P>
<P><A HREF="#facebook">Facebook</A></P>
<P><A HREF="#zoom">Zoom</A></P>
</UL>
<H3><A HREF="#figures">Public Figures</A></H3><UL>
<P><A HREF="#tillis">Tillis, Thom</A></P>
</UL>
<H3><A HREF="#acknowledgements">Acknowledgements</A></H3>
</UL>
<H2 ID="disclaimers">Disclaimers</H2><UL>
<P>
I would like to mention that the omission of a brand or figure on this list does not make them good.
For instance, Donald Trump is not yet well-covered on this list because of the sheer quantity of terrible things he's done.
@ -46,9 +61,13 @@ There are parts of this list that contain commentary of my own (rather than cont
Finally, I'm human and I make mistakes curating this list.
Removed entries listed with explanations as to why they were removed.
</P>
<P>
I do this to jog my own memory, not to make money.
Please redirect any donations to <A HREF="https://archive.org/donate/">The Internet Archive</A>.
Without their Wayback Machine this list would be impossible to compile.
</UL>
<H2>Brands</H2> <!-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -->
<H2 ID="brands">Brands</H2>
<UL>
<LI ID="alphabet">Alphabet, Inc.</LI><UL>
<LI>2018</LI><UL>
@ -420,6 +439,24 @@ Lots of these articles are full of fluff but their critiques are still interesti
<P>See: <A HREF="#alphabet">Alphabet, Inc.</A></P>
</UL>
<LI ID="thehill">The Hill</LI><UL>
<LI>2020</LI><UL>
<P><A HREF="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1344292928215281665">
"California nurse tests positive for coronavirus one week after receiving vaccine: report"</A> (Twitter; @thehill) (<A HREF="https://web.archive.org/web/20201230205836/https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1344292928215281665">Archive link</A>)
</P><UL>
<P>
The Nurse in the
<A HREF="https://thehill.com/homenews/news/532062-california-nurse-tests-positive-for-coronavirus-one-week-after-receiving">article</A> (<A HREF="https://web.archive.org/web/20201230202853/https://thehill.com/homenews/news/532062-california-nurse-tests-positive-for-coronavirus-one-week-after-receiving">archive link</A>)
tested positive one week after they received the Pfizer vaccine.
The article only halfway through mentions that the vaccine starts to become effective ten to fourteen days after administration.
This is an inexcusably misleading headline about a vaccine designed to fight a pandemic that has killed more than three hundred thousand people in America,
the country in which The Hill is centralized, alone.
</P>
<P><B>It should be noted that this sole tweet does not indicate a pattern of behavior.</B></P>
</UL>
</UL>
</UL>
<LI>iOS</LI><UL>
<P>See: <A HREF="#apple">Apple Computer</A></P>
</UL>
@ -579,7 +616,7 @@ Lots of these articles are full of fluff but their critiques are still interesti
</UL>
</UL>
<H2>Public Figures</H2> <!-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -->
<H2 ID="figures">Public Figures</H2>
<UL>
<LI>Banks, Azealia</LI><UL>
@ -820,11 +857,11 @@ Lots of these articles are full of fluff but their critiques are still interesti
<A HREF="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140128/08542126021/new-york-times-suffers-redaction-failure-exposes-name-nsa-agent-targeted-network-uploaded-pdf.shtml">
New York Times Suffers Redaction Failure, Exposes Name Of NSA Agent And Targeted Network In Uploaded PDF</A> (Techdirt; Cushing, Tim) <!-- (<A HREF="">Archive link</A>) -->
</P><UL>
<P><B>Upon review it's uncertain whose mistake this was. Citing this article (on its own) as a reason to dislike the New York times was a mistake.</B></P>
<P><B>Upon review it's uncertain whose mistake this redaction failure was. Citing this article on its own as a reason to dislike the New York times was wrong.</B></P>
</UL>
</UL>
<H2>Acknowledgements</H2><UL>
<H2 ID="acknowledgements">Acknowledgements</H2><UL>
<LI><A HREF="#stallman">Richard Stallman</A>, from whose webpage I stole a lot of links.</LI>
<LI>My friend Yarah, for contributing a couple articles.</LI>
<LI>My friend Jacob Morin, for calling to my attention an error in my curation.</LI>