bonsai/harakit
5
4
Fork 3
Code Issues 44 Pull Requests 9 Projects 1 Releases 27 Activity

really bad dj(1) bugs #139

New Issue
Closed
opened 2024-07-10 06:28:05 +00:00 by emma · 5 comments
emma commented 2024-07-10 06:28:05 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link
$ dj -B 256 -c 1 -i /dev/urandom -o file 
zsh: segmentation fault  dj -B 256 -c 1 -i /dev/urandom -o file

This segfaults on my Linux system but creates a file upward of 250kB on my OpenBSD system.

This behavior is in the current version of the main branch.

``` $ dj -B 256 -c 1 -i /dev/urandom -o file zsh: segmentation fault dj -B 256 -c 1 -i /dev/urandom -o file ``` This segfaults on my Linux system but creates a `file` upward of 250kB on my OpenBSD system. This behavior is in the current version of the main branch.
emma added the
bug
 label 2024-07-10 06:28:05 +00:00
trinity was assigned by emma 2024-07-10 06:28:05 +00:00
emma commented 2024-07-10 06:34:22 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

There are more issues with the vagueness of the dj.1 manpage I also want to clear up that I only encountered once trying to use it for practical purposes.

There are more issues with the vagueness of the `dj.1` manpage I also want to clear up that I only encountered once trying to use it for practical purposes.
silt commented 2024-07-10 06:36:21 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

just took a look at the dj code and honestly it's pretty grody in its current state. this has motivated the filing of #140, which should hopefully make the c code in the tree a little more maintainable in the future.

just took a look at the dj code and honestly it's pretty grody in its current state. this has motivated the filing of https://git.tebibyte.media/bonsai/harakit/issues/140, which should hopefully make the c code in the tree a little more maintainable in the future.
trinity commented 2024-07-10 18:33:03 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

Does this bug exist on the dj branch?

Does this bug exist on the dj branch?
silt commented 2024-07-10 19:31:40 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

worth mentioning that dj works fine on both branches for me, not sure where the inconsistency would come from.

worth mentioning that dj works fine on both branches for me, not sure where the inconsistency would come from.
emma commented 2024-07-12 20:57:23 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Does this bug exist on the dj branch?

It does not.

> Does this bug exist on the dj branch? It does not.
emma closed this issue 2024-07-15 20:02:22 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
bug

Something is not working

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
help wanted

Need some help

  
invalid

Something is wrong

  
joke

you are silly!

  
question

More information is needed

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No Label
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
joke
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
trinity
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: bonsai/harakit#139
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?