bonsai/harakit
5
4
Fork 3
Code Issues 37 Pull Requests 7 Projects 1 Releases 30 Activity

conv(1) – convert data #47

New Issue
Closed
opened 2024-02-07 20:32:25 -07:00 by emma · 9 comments
emma commented 2024-02-07 20:32:25 -07:00
Owner
Copy Link

conv(1) should at least support converting between standard Unicode encodings, ASCII, and other international standardized encodings. It should also convert between at least hexadecimal, decimal, octal, and binary.

`conv(1)` should at least support converting between standard Unicode encodings, ASCII, and other international standardized encodings. It should also convert between at least hexadecimal, decimal, octal, and binary.
emma added the
enhancement
help wanted
question
 labels 2024-02-07 20:32:25 -07:00
trinity commented 2024-02-14 17:41:09 -07:00
Owner
Copy Link

Why would one tool do both character encoding conversion and number base conversion?

Why would one tool do both character encoding conversion and number base conversion?
emma commented 2024-02-15 23:17:03 -07:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

I felt like it made sense as one tool, but if you feel it should be two,
we could do that.

I felt like it made sense as one tool, but if you feel it should be two, we could do that.
trinity commented 2024-05-22 13:58:04 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

I'm undecided about conv(1) itself. Lately I've been thinking of multiple tools:

  • case(1) - For changing character cases.
  • code(1) - For changing character encodings.
  • base(1) - For changing number bases.
I'm undecided about conv(1) itself. Lately I've been thinking of multiple tools: - case(1) - For changing character cases. - code(1) - For changing character encodings. - base(1) - For changing number bases.
emma commented 2024-05-22 14:58:01 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

I am a fan of this

I am a fan of this
trinity commented 2024-05-23 23:33:17 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

intbase(1), strcase(1), and strcode(1) might be better

intbase(1), strcase(1), and strcode(1) might be better
trinity commented 2024-05-23 23:33:53 -06:00
Owner
Copy Link

Oops, didn't mean to close.

Oops, didn't mean to close.
trinity reopened this issue 2024-05-23 23:33:54 -06:00
emma commented 2024-05-24 10:37:40 -06:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

intbase(1), strcase(1), and strcode(1) might be better

I am really not a fan of these names, though.

> intbase(1), strcase(1), and strcode(1) might be better I am really not a fan of these names, though.
sashakoshka commented 2024-05-24 12:08:27 -06:00
Copy Link

strcode(1)

strenc(1) might be better for string encoding.

> strcode(1) strenc(1) might be better for string encoding.
emma commented 2024-12-16 15:56:58 -07:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

This is too general, for sure. I am closing this for neatness for now but we should revisit conversions at a later time.

This is too general, for sure. I am closing this for neatness for now but we should revisit conversions at a later time.
emma closed this issue 2024-12-16 15:56:58 -07:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
bug

Something is not working

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
help wanted

Need some help

  
invalid

Something is wrong

  
joke

you are silly!

  
question

More information is needed

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No Label
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
joke
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: bonsai/harakit#47
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?