README: fix vagueness #149

Closed
trinity wants to merge 0 commits from rdme into main
Owner

This is a continuation of #147. I've made a first attempt at making the README a bit more clearer and I'm interested in everyone's thoughts on the matter.

This is a continuation of #147. I've made a first attempt at making the README a bit more clearer and I'm interested in everyone's thoughts on the matter.
trinity added the
bug
enhancement
labels 2024-07-18 09:34:55 -06:00
trinity added 1 commit 2024-07-18 09:34:56 -06:00
trinity requested review from emma 2024-07-18 09:35:07 -06:00
trinity requested review from sashakoshka 2024-07-18 09:35:08 -06:00
Author
Owner

A notable omission is a good definition of hara. Emma - could you add one?

A notable omission is a good definition of *hara*. Emma - could you add one?
First-time contributor

I think these are good changes, it better defines the scope of the project.

I think these are good changes, it better defines the scope of the project.
trinity changed title from WIP: README: fix vagueness to README: fix vagueness 2024-07-25 20:25:41 -06:00
emma added 1 commit 2024-08-12 17:54:13 -06:00
Owner

@trinity, how does this look?

@trinity, how does this look?
emma added 1 commit 2024-08-30 21:23:11 -06:00
Author
Owner

Good additions.

Good additions.
emma approved these changes 2024-09-05 13:39:32 -06:00
Owner

Merged.

Merged.
emma closed this pull request 2024-09-05 17:03:42 -06:00
emma deleted branch rdme 2024-09-05 17:03:49 -06:00

Pull request closed

Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: bonsai/harakit#149
No description provided.